November 2008

Communicating in plain English

At this point, we’ve all been barraged by Krug’s “don’t make me think” mantra a nearly infinite amount of times.  I remember the first time I heard this phrase: sitting in Web 1 class, learning how to code html the “right” way.  Our instructor was raging on about standard web design conventions, how one should be careful not to stray too far outside of the box, but rather tiptoe around its perimeter so as to not confuse the average internet user.  “Don’t make me think,” he said.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I completely agree with the fact that the user interface and information architecture shouldn’t get in the way of what you are trying to do on any given web site, but sorry, I rather like thinking.   Continue Reading »

By Douglas

Progressive Ideologies
Strategy
Technology

Comments (0)

Permalink

Coding Ahead of Yourself

When you’re maintaining a software product which evolves and expands in order to remain competitive and make itself more useful to a user base, it’s easy to forget to keep all the moving parts in line with changes and new features as you roll them out. However, if this issue isn’t dealt with, bugs and performance issues will inevitably arise.

LiveWhale, our CMS, is essentially a module-based system. Individual modules can be provided to our customers on a per-client basis. Each module is a self-contained element, that “registers” itself in the CMS framework, thereby establishing its functionality throughout. A module is responsible for creating and managing its own data, but if it is flagged as group owned, access to that data is handled by LiveWhale’s users and groups system. Continue Reading »

By Alex

Behind the scenes
Best Practices
Tips

Comments (0)

Permalink

Virtual 3D Internet of the Future, We Hardly Knew Ye

Google Unplugs Lively as Hype Fades Over Virtual Worlds

Although Google’s entry into Second Life’s market gave many of us .edu-dev-type people the sense that maybe there WAS something to this virtual worlds thing, it looks like that was a short-lived experiment.  From a Reuters article cited in the above:

It’s hard to say what, if anything, Linden Lab can do to make Second Life appeal to a general audience. The very things that most appeal to Second Life’s hardcore enthusiasts are either boring or creepy for most people: Spending hundreds of hours of effort to make insignificant amounts of money selling virtual clothes, experimenting with changing your gender or species, getting into random conversations with strangers from around the world, or having pseudo-nonymous sex (and let’s not kid ourselves, sex is a huge draw into Second Life). As part of walking my “beat,” I’d get invited by sources to virtual nightclubs, where I’d right-click the dancefloor to send my avatar gyrating as I sat at home at my computer. It was about as fun as watching paint dry.

Although I’ve expressed my skepticism about virtual worlds in higher ed before, I do feel sorry for those colleges out there that can’t afford to redesign their viewbooks this year because their budget is tied up in the maintenance of a Second Life island.

By Jason

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

The Uncommon Application, Part I: The personal touch

I have made no secret of the fact that White Whale would jump at the chance to develop a customized college admission application.

More and more of our clients are moving to the Common Application— in most cases that’s because homegrown applications tend to be unwieldy and hard to manage, and it’s easy to see how tempting it’d be to outsource that whole process— information gathering, account creation, payment collection, reporting, security, etc.— to a third party.  I don’t know if the Common App is a publicly held company, but I wouldn’t say no to a gift of stock options if they were.

However.  Although the Common App is certainly a convenient way to manage the process of college admission, doesn’t it feel like a missed opportunity?

The process of applying to college is an anxious, scary time, as anyone who’s ever done it can attest.  With a very few exceptions, nobody’s going to be accepted everywhere they apply.  So in applying, you know you’ll be rejected somewhere, and the kind of self-revelation required in a good college application adds a fear of exposure to the process.   (At least that’s what it was like for me.)

If that’s the case, it seems that a college or university could do a great deal to alleviate this anxiety— and build a relationship with the prospective student— by presenting her with a thoughtful, friendly, easy to use, customized, streamlined and responsive, online application.

The first step in applying using the Common App looks like this:

Common App opening screen

Wouldn’t it be better if the first page started like this?

Hi.

It’s great that you’re applying to Middlebury.  Our applicant pool always includes an incredibly diverse group of interesting and thoughtful young people from around the country and around the world.  The students that join Middlebury next fall will become part of a close-knit academic community; we expect a lot from our students, and we give a lot in return.  In other words, we aren’t just looking for the best students, we’re looking for the best neighbors.

We’re looking forward to reading your application. If you have any questions at all about the process, e-mail John Doe, our online application support counselor, at JohnDoe@middlebury.edu.

To get started, enter your first and last name below.

We know from experience that students choose colleges based on direct connections.  Sometimes it’s a friend they made touring campus; sometimes it’s a favorite book by an alumni author; sometimes it’s a discussion on Facebook.  Sometimes university Web sites include tools that encourage connections as well— for example, Haverford will occasionally let a select group of admits or top prospects create student profiles, and we’re working on a project for Lewis & Clark that will let prospective students create customized portal pages just like faculty, staff and current students.

The question is, why can’t that sense of personal contact extend to the application itself? I’ve suggested some of the most typical reasons why colleges go to the Common App— convenience, security, stability, etc.  These are all fine reasons to outsource the application; there are other reasons too.  It is undeniably more convenient for the *applicant* to only enter their information one time and apply to multiple colleges at once.  Web database development projects done in-house are notoriously hard to maintain over time; this is one reason why schools’ own online applications are often a little clunky.  And there aren’t many companies that offer customized application development.

(The reason for this last case are clear.  The perfect online application would be the better mousetrap, and it’s hard to even think about how you’d build a college application without seeing visions of how the world of higher ed would beat a path to your door.)

But it’s my belief that when the right school— unsatisfied with the Common App, wanting to create personal contact with applicants, and without the staff or the time to develop an application in house— meets the right Web development vendor, a few steps might be taken toward an online application that will itself do some of the work of recruiting great applicants.

Consider this blog post a want ad; I think we’re the right company for that job, and if anybody’s interested in talking about it, let me know.  Over the next several days I’ll be posting a few more thoughts on this topic— how an application might reach out and speak directly to students, building connections in the process.  If anyone else has any ideas about what the ideal application might do, please drop me a line.

By Jason

Strategy

Comments (4)

Permalink

Screencast Demo of the Week

In the process of developing documentation for LiveWhale, our new CMS, we have begun to record screencasts to demo LW’s features.  Often it’s easier to show than tell, when it comes to CMS features; a narrated demonstration lets us inject a little personality.  And it’s also a lot faster than writing out a how-to page (although we’ll have to have written documentation as well, it does seem to be the case that nobody will actually read it).

Our first effort, a screencast of LiveWhale’s news system, leaves much to be desired; it’s clear that we’re new at this.  It’s hard to figure out the right tone of voice (how much humor?  how fast?  etc.), and it took several takes to get through it without messing anything up.  (And we still had to edit the final product a bit.)  I’m sure it’s something we’ll continue to refine and improve as we continue developing LiveWhale’s documentation.

All of this is to say that I  just watched the most effective screencast demo I’ve seen in a long time, if not ever.

Continue Reading »

By Jason

Behind the scenes

Comments (1)

Permalink